OURPCB Logo
Wire harness production facility showing prototype to production scaling
Learning CenterDevelopment Guide

Prototyping to Production: Scaling Your Wire Harness Design in 2026

A comprehensive roadmap through the 6 critical stages from concept to mass production. Learn what to expect, common pitfalls, and how to accelerate your timeline without compromising quality.

18 min read|Updated: January 2026|Development Guide

The $127,000 Mistake: A Sydney Robotics Startup's Story

In 2025, a Sydney-based robotics company rushed their wire harness design from prototype to production in just 6 weeks—half the recommended timeline. They skipped DVT and PVT stages to meet a trade show deadline.

Result? Their first production run of 500 units had a 31% failure rate. The crimp tool settings optimized for prototypes didn't translate to volume production. They faced $127,000 in rework costs, an 8-week production delay, and lost their anchor customer.

The lesson? Each validation stage exists for a reason. This guide will help you navigate from prototype to production successfully—without cutting corners that cost you dearly later.

The Prototyping Journey: What to Expect

Developing a wire harness from concept to production-ready isn't a linear process—it's iterative. Each stage builds on the last, uncovering issues before they become expensive problems in mass production.

The 6 Critical Stages

1
Concept & Design Review
Stage 1
1-2 weeks
2
First Article Samples
Stage 2
2-3 weeks
3
Engineering Validation (EVT)
Stage 3
2-3 weeks
4
Design Validation (DVT)
Stage 4
3-4 weeks
5
Production Validation (PVT)
Stage 5
2-3 weeks
6
Mass Production
Stage 6
Ongoing

The Golden Rule of Product Development

Finding and fixing issues gets exponentially more expensive with each stage. A design flaw caught in Stage 1 costs $50 to fix. The same issue found in production costs $5,000-50,000 to rectify. This is why we validate thoroughly at each stage before proceeding.

1

Stage 1: Concept & Design Review

Duration: 1-2 weeks

This foundational stage sets the trajectory for your entire project. Get it right here, and you'll save weeks of iteration later.

What Happens in This Stage

Requirements Gathering
Electrical specifications, environmental conditions, certifications needed
Design for Manufacturing Review
Identifying production challenges before they become problems
Component Selection
Choosing connectors, wires, and materials with production scalability in mind
Cost & Timeline Estimate
Realistic budgets for prototype through production

Critical Questions Your Manufacturer Should Ask

Operating environment: Temperature range? Vibration exposure? Chemical resistance needed?
Volume projections: How many units in year 1? Year 2? This affects tooling decisions.
Certifications: UL? CE? RCM? Different certifications require different approaches.
Budget constraints: What's more important—lowest unit cost or fastest time to market?
Installation method: Hand-assembled by technicians or automated production line?

Design for Manufacturing (DFM) Best Practices

Following DFM principles from the start prevents costly redesigns later. Learn more about Design for Manufacturing best practices to reduce costs and improve production efficiency.

  • Standardize components: Using common connector families reduces inventory and tooling costs
  • Design for testability: Include test points for automated continuity and hi-pot testing
  • Consider wire routing: Complex routing increases assembly time and error rates
  • Label requirements: Plan labeling locations that work in production

Stage 1 Deliverables

  • • Detailed electrical schematic
  • • Bill of Materials (BOM) with sourcing notes
  • • DFM review report with recommendations
  • • Cost estimate for prototype and production
  • • Project timeline and milestone plan
2

Stage 2: First Article Samples

Duration: 2-3 weeks

This is where your design becomes physical reality for the first time. First article samples prove basic functionality and give you something tangible to test with.

What Makes a Good First Article Sample

Use Production-Intent Materials

Don't use "close enough" substitutes. If your production wire is 18 AWG UL1015, your prototype should be too. Material properties affect everything from flexibility to termination quality.

Production-Intent Processes (Where Practical)

Even if automated crimping isn't set up yet, use the same crimp terminals and wire sizes you'll use in production. This validates that the terminations are physically manufacturable.

Build Quantity: 5-10 Units Minimum

One sample tells you nothing about consistency. Our prototyping services typically deliver 5-10 first articles so you can conduct destructive testing on some while using others for integration.

Real Customer Conversation

Customer (Medical Device Startup):
"Can we save time and cost by using a cheaper wire type for prototypes? We only need 10 samples initially."
Our Engineering Team:
"We strongly recommend against it. Here's why: your production wire is medical-grade silicone with specific flexibility and biocompatibility properties. Standard PVC wire behaves completely differently during routing and installation. If you prototype with PVC and it works, you might find that silicone creates routing issues you didn't anticipate. Better to discover that now with $800 in wire than after $15,000 in tooling."
Customer:
"That makes sense. Let's use production materials from the start."

This conversation saved the customer an estimated 3 weeks and $12,000 in redesign costs when they transitioned to production materials.

Testing to Perform on First Articles

Basic Electrical Tests

  • • Continuity verification
  • • Hi-pot / dielectric strength
  • • Insulation resistance
  • • Connector mating force

Physical/Mechanical Tests

  • • Crimp pull force (destructive)
  • • Flexibility and bend radius
  • • Overall length and routing
  • • Connector orientation
First article wire harness samples undergoing testing

First article samples undergo comprehensive electrical and mechanical testing

Stage 2 Deliverables

  • • 5-10 physical samples with production-intent materials
  • • First Article Inspection Report (FAIR)
  • • Test reports (continuity, hi-pot, pull force)
  • • Dimensional verification against drawings
  • • Feedback on any design issues discovered
3

Stage 3: Engineering Validation Testing (EVT)

Duration: 2-3 weeks

EVT proves that your design works correctly from a technical standpoint. This stage validates electrical performance, mechanical fit, and basic environmental requirements.

Key Objectives of EVT

Validate Electrical Design

Confirm voltage drops, current capacity, signal integrity meet specifications under load conditions

Mechanical Integration Testing

Does it fit in your product? Are connector locations correct? Can it be routed as intended?

Initial Environmental Testing

Basic temperature cycling, vibration, humidity exposure appropriate to application

Design Refinement

Identify and fix issues before committing to production tooling

Typical EVT Build: 20-50 Units

EVT builds are larger than first article samples to support more comprehensive testing:

  • • 5-10 units for electrical testing and characterization
  • • 5-10 units for environmental testing (temperature, vibration, humidity)
  • • 5-10 units for mechanical integration and fit testing
  • • 5-10 units for destructive testing (crimp cross-sections, pull tests, aging)
  • • 5-10 units for customer alpha testing or internal validation

Common Issues Discovered During EVT

Voltage Drop Higher Than Expected
Solution: Increase wire gauge or reduce harness length if possible
Connector Doesn't Fit in Tight Spaces
Solution: Switch to right-angle or low-profile connector variant
Wire Too Stiff for Required Routing
Solution: Change to more flexible wire construction or add strain relief
EMI/Signal Integrity Issues
Solution: Add shielding, change wire twisting, or separate signal/power wires
Crimp Terminals Fail Pull Test
Solution: Optimize crimp tool settings or change terminal specification

Stage 3 Deliverables

  • • 20-50 EVT units built with production processes
  • • Comprehensive test report (electrical, mechanical, environmental)
  • • Updated drawings reflecting design changes
  • • Risk assessment and mitigation plan
  • • Go/No-Go recommendation for DVT stage
4

Stage 4: Design Validation Testing (DVT)

Duration: 3-4 weeks

DVT proves your harness design is ready for the real world. This stage validates reliability, durability, and performance under actual use conditions—not just lab conditions.

EVT vs DVT: What's the Difference?

EVT Asks:

"Does the design work correctly?"

  • • Lab testing under controlled conditions
  • • Validates technical specifications
  • • Identifies fundamental design flaws
DVT Asks:

"Will it work reliably in customers' hands?"

  • • Real-world testing and field trials
  • • Validates durability and reliability
  • • Tests abuse cases and edge scenarios

Comprehensive DVT Testing Protocol

Environmental Testing (Extended)

  • • Temperature cycling: -40°C to +85°C (or per spec), 100+ cycles
  • • Humidity aging: 85% RH at 85°C for 500+ hours
  • • Thermal shock: rapid temperature changes
  • • Salt spray (marine/outdoor applications)

Mechanical/Vibration Testing

  • • Random vibration per industry standards (automotive, aerospace, etc.)
  • • Mechanical shock testing
  • • Connector insertion/extraction cycles (1000+ cycles)
  • • Flex cycling for dynamic applications

Compliance & Certification Testing

  • IPC/WHMA-A-620 workmanship inspection
  • • UL, CE, or other required certifications initiated
  • • Industry-specific standards (automotive, medical, etc.)
  • • RoHS, REACH material compliance verification

Beta Testing / Field Trials

  • • Install in actual customer products or use environments
  • • Collect feedback on installation ease, serviceability
  • • Monitor for unexpected failure modes
  • • Validate that documentation and labeling are adequate

Typical DVT Build: 100-300 Units

DVT requires significantly more units than EVT because testing is more extensive and destructive:

  • • 30-50 units consumed in environmental testing
  • • 30-50 units for mechanical/vibration testing
  • • 20-30 units for certification testing (UL, CE, etc.)
  • • 20-50 units for beta/field trials with customers
  • • 10-20 units reserved for design verification documentation

Critical Decision Point: Production Tooling

DVT is typically when you commit to production tooling (crimp tools, fixtures, testing jigs). This represents significant investment—often $5,000-30,000 depending on complexity. Only proceed with tooling after DVT testing confirms the design is stable. Design changes after tooling is ordered can cost 5-10x more than changes made earlier.

Stage 4 Deliverables

  • • 100-300 DVT units for comprehensive testing
  • • Complete test reports (environmental, mechanical, compliance)
  • • Field trial feedback summary and resolution plan
  • • Updated production drawings (final design freeze)
  • • Design Verification Report with pass/fail criteria
  • • Tooling approval and procurement (if all tests pass)
5

Stage 5: Production Validation Testing (PVT)

Duration: 2-3 weeks

PVT is the final checkpoint before mass production. While DVT validated the design, PVT validates the manufacturing process. Can we build this consistently, at volume, with acceptable quality and cost?

What PVT Validates

Process Capability

Can we maintain quality at production rates? What's the defect rate? Are operators trained?

Tooling & Equipment Qualification

Verify all production tooling produces parts within specification consistently

Supply Chain Readiness

Are all materials qualified and suppliers capable of volume delivery?

Quality System Validation

Is inspection documentation in place? Are control plans active?

Typical PVT Build: 300-1000 Units

PVT builds are the first "production-like" runs using final tooling and processes:

  • • Built using production tooling, fixtures, and equipment
  • • Production operators (not engineering technicians) assemble units
  • • Full production documentation and work instructions used
  • • Complete quality inspection at production rates
  • • Statistical sampling to establish process capability (Cpk)

Key Metrics Tracked During PVT

First Pass Yield (FPY)

Percentage of units passing all tests on first attempt

95%+
Target for simple designs
Process Capability (Cpk)

Statistical measure of process consistency

1.33+
Acceptable for production
Cycle Time

Assembly time per unit

Should match cost estimates within 10%
Defect Rate

Defects per million opportunities (DPMO)

Target varies by industry; automotive typically requires <500 DPMO

Common Issues Found During PVT

Crimp height variation: Tooling that worked for 100 units shows drift at 500 units—requires periodic calibration
Operator errors: Work instructions unclear or missing steps—revised documentation needed
Material lot variation: Wire from different supplier lots has slightly different stripping behavior
Testing bottlenecks: Automated test fixture can't keep up with assembly rate

These are GOOD problems to find now. Discovering them in a pilot run of 500 units costs far less than finding them after producing 5,000 defective units.

Our PVT Quality Approach

At OurPCB, we follow strict quality management processes during PVT to ensure production readiness:

  • • IATF 16949 compliant Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
  • • Statistical Process Control (SPC) on critical dimensions
  • • Measurement System Analysis (MSA) for test equipment
  • • Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
  • • Full traceability with lot tracking from materials through final test

Stage 5 Deliverables

  • • 300-1000 PVT units built with production tooling and processes
  • • Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) documentation
  • • Process capability study (Cpk report)
  • • Updated control plan and inspection documentation
  • • Production readiness review and final approval
  • • Supply chain qualification complete
6

Stage 6: Mass Production

Duration: Ongoing

You've made it! Your design has been validated, your process is qualified, and you're ready to scale. But mass production isn't "set and forget"—continuous monitoring and improvement are essential.

What Success Looks Like in Mass Production

Consistent Quality
First pass yield stays above 95%, defect rates within control limits
On-Time Delivery
Meeting committed lead times consistently (our track record: 99.2% to AU/NZ)
Cost Targets Met
Actual costs within 5-10% of quoted costs
Scalability
Ability to handle volume increases without quality degradation

Ongoing Production Activities

Continuous Quality Monitoring

Statistical process control charts, periodic capability studies, regular crimp pull tests, and automated electrical testing on 100% of units.

Supply Chain Management

Material lot traceability, supplier performance tracking, obsolescence monitoring (especially for connectors/components), and dual-sourcing for critical materials.

Continuous Improvement

Cost reduction initiatives, process optimization, and engineering change management for customer-requested modifications.

Our Production Capabilities

Explore our full range of manufacturing services designed to support your production needs:

500,000 Units/Month Capacity
Scale from 100 to 100,000+ units seamlessly
2-3 Week Standard Lead Time
Rush service available for urgent orders
No Minimum Order Quantity
Order from 1 piece to millions
Free Shipping Over $1000 AUD
To Australia and New Zealand

Common Pitfalls & How to Avoid Them

After 18 years and thousands of projects, we've seen the same mistakes repeated. Here's how to avoid the most common and costly pitfalls.

1. Skipping Validation Stages to 'Save Time'
Why it's costly: Every time a customer has skipped DVT or PVT to meet a deadline, they've ended up taking LONGER overall due to production issues.
How to avoid: If you're time-constrained, parallel-path activities (like starting tooling quotes during DVT) rather than skipping stages entirely. The only safe shortcut: combine EVT/DVT for very simple designs.
2. Using Non-Production Materials in Prototypes
Why it's costly: Substituting components 'just for prototyping' creates false confidence. Properties like wire flexibility, connector retention force, and crimp behavior can be drastically different.
How to avoid: Insist on production-intent materials from first article samples onward. The extra cost ($500-2000) is trivial compared to redesign costs later.
3. Ignoring Design for Manufacturing (DFM)
Why it's costly: A design that works beautifully as a hand-built prototype can be a nightmare in production. We've seen designs requiring 20 minutes of hand-assembly when 2 minutes should suffice.
How to avoid: Engage your manufacturer's engineering team in Stage 1. Ask specifically: 'What would you change to make this easier to build at volume?'
4. Underestimating Tooling Lead Times
Why it's costly: Custom crimp tools, test fixtures, and assembly jigs often have 4-8 week lead times. Customers regularly discover this AFTER DVT, adding unexpected delays.
How to avoid: Get tooling quotes during EVT. Long-lead items can be ordered during DVT once the design is mostly stable (with change order provisions if needed).
5. Not Planning for Supply Chain Constraints
Why it's costly: That perfect connector might have a 16-week lead time. In 2024-2026, component availability is still challenging for many electronic components.
How to avoid: Check material availability in Stage 1. For long-lead components, consider: (1) dual-sourcing, (2) buying ahead for prototyping, or (3) accepting component substitutions with your manufacturer's guidance.
6. Inadequate Testing Sample Sizes
Why it's costly: Testing 3 units and concluding 'it works' provides almost no statistical confidence. What's the actual failure rate? 1%? 10%? You won't know until production.
How to avoid: Follow recommended sample sizes: EVT 20-50, DVT 100-300, PVT 300-1000. These aren't arbitrary—they provide statistical validity.
7. Over-Specifying Requirements
Why it's costly: Requiring automotive-grade components for an indoor consumer product adds 30-50% to costs unnecessarily. Every requirement has a cost.
How to avoid: Challenge every specification: 'Do we REALLY need this?' Work with your manufacturer to right-size requirements to actual use conditions.
8. Poor Communication with Manufacturing Team
Why it's costly: Assuming the manufacturer understands your application context leads to misaligned expectations and suboptimal design choices.
How to avoid: Share your complete application context: how it's used, environment, criticality, volume projections, cost targets. The more we know, the better we can optimize.

Timeline Expectations: How Long Does Each Stage Really Take?

One of the most common questions: "When can we start production?" Here are realistic timelines based on our 18 years of experience across thousands of projects.

StageSimple DesignModerate ComplexityComplex/Regulated
Concept & Design Review1 week1-2 weeks2-3 weeks
First Article Samples2 weeks2-3 weeks3-4 weeks
EVT2 weeks2-3 weeks3-4 weeks
DVT2-3 weeks3-4 weeks4-6 weeks
PVT2 weeks2-3 weeks3-4 weeks
TOTAL TO PRODUCTION9-11 weeks12-16 weeks17-24 weeks

Design Complexity Definitions

Simple Design
  • • 5-15 wires
  • • 2-4 connectors
  • • Standard components
  • • No certifications required
  • • Benign environment
Moderate Complexity
  • • 15-50 wires
  • • 4-10 connectors
  • • Mix of standard/custom
  • • Basic certifications (UL, CE)
  • • Industrial environment
Complex/Regulated
  • • 50+ wires
  • • 10+ connectors
  • • Custom/specialized components
  • • Automotive/medical/aerospace certs
  • • Harsh environment

Can You Accelerate the Timeline?

Yes, but with caveats. Safe acceleration strategies:

Parallel-Path Activities
Start tooling quotes during EVT, place long-lead material orders during DVT, begin documentation during PVT. This can save 2-4 weeks overall without compromising validation.
Combine EVT + DVT (Simple Designs Only)
For very simple designs with no regulatory requirements, you can combine these stages, saving 2-3 weeks. We only recommend this for designs with <20 wires and straightforward applications.
Pre-qualified Components
Using connectors and wires your manufacturer has used before eliminates unknowns and can shave 1-2 weeks off early stages.

Never skip PVT. We cannot stress this enough. Customers who skip PVT to save 2-3 weeks almost always lose 6-12 weeks dealing with production issues. It's a false economy.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does it take to go from prototype to production for a wire harness?

For a typical wire harness project, expect 12-16 weeks from initial prototype to mass production readiness. This includes Concept & Design Review (1-2 weeks), First Article Samples (2-3 weeks), EVT (2-3 weeks), DVT (3-4 weeks), and PVT (2-3 weeks). Complex products with regulatory requirements may take 20-24 weeks.

What is the difference between EVT, DVT, and PVT in wire harness development?

EVT (Engineering Validation Testing) validates the technical design and functionality—does it work correctly? DVT (Design Validation Testing) confirms the design works reliably under real-world conditions—will it work in customers' hands? PVT (Production Validation Testing) validates that the manufacturing process can consistently produce at volume with acceptable quality and cost—can we make it efficiently?

What are the most common mistakes when scaling wire harness production?

The top mistakes include: (1) skipping validation stages to save time, (2) using non-production materials in prototypes, (3) failing to consider Design for Manufacturing principles, (4) underestimating tooling lead times, and (5) not planning for supply chain constraints. These mistakes typically add 4-8 weeks to timelines and increase costs by 15-30%.

How much should I budget for wire harness prototyping?

Budget $2,000-5,000 for simple harness prototypes (10-20 wires), $5,000-15,000 for moderate complexity (20-50 wires with multiple connectors), and $15,000-40,000+ for complex automotive/medical harnesses requiring extensive testing. Include 20% contingency for design iterations. Production tooling adds another $5,000-30,000 depending on complexity.

Can I skip stages to accelerate time to market?

While it's tempting to skip stages, this usually backfires. The only safe shortcuts are: (1) combining EVT and DVT for very simple designs, or (2) parallel-pathing some activities (like tooling preparation during DVT). Never skip PVT—production issues caught late cost 10-50x more to fix than prototype-stage issues. We've seen customers who skipped stages lose 2-3 months dealing with production problems, far more than they 'saved.'

Do you offer prototyping services for Australian customers?

Yes. We provide complete prototyping to production services with local support in Melbourne. Our standard prototype lead time is 2-3 weeks for first article samples, even for complex designs with 40+ wires. We maintain no minimum order quantities, so you can order from 1 prototype to millions of production units.

What certifications do you have for production?

We're certified to ISO 9001:2015 and IATF 16949:2016 (automotive quality standard). Our testing laboratory holds CNAS and ISO/IEC 17025 certification with international mutual recognition. We follow IPC/WHMA-A-620 workmanship standards and can support UL, CE, RCM, and other certification requirements.

Ready to Start Your Wire Harness Development Journey?

Whether you're at the concept stage or ready to scale to production, our engineering team can guide you through every step. Get expert advice and a detailed project timeline within 24 hours.

What You'll Get:

Free DFM review of your design with optimization suggestions
Detailed timeline from prototype through production
Transparent pricing for each stage with no hidden costs
Material availability check and lead time verification
Melbourne Office: 1/30 Seaford Road, VIC 3198
+61-3-9785-1090

Related Articles

Explore Our Services